| Object of impact |
Impact |
Alternative 0 (no new
cabin) |
Alternative 1 (proposal
by the young) |
Alternative 2 (proposal
by the working group) |
| Other people than local
inhabitants in Runosmäki |
Public image of the
area |
Public image of the area
will become less positive. |
Public image of the area
will improve. |
Public image of the area
will improve. |
| Children (under school
age) |
Tidiness of the
playground |
The playground will be less
littered, but probably increased littering around the child
day-care centre |
Increased littering around
the playground |
Increased littering around
the playground |
|
Young people |
An out-of-the-way place for
young people to gather in the evenings |
The situation will remain
unchanged; greater numbers of young people will gather in the
"centre" of Runosmäki, when the Youth Centre is closed. |
The new cabin will be
situated as proposed by the young. All will be well, the cabin will
be used actively by the young. |
No major difference was seen
between this alternative and Alternative 1. The only minor
disadvantage is the cabin's location somewhat deeper in the
forest. |
| Social sector
work/services |
Social problems from young people's point of view
Social problems from local inhabitants' point of view |
Ill-being among the young
will increase without suitable places for them to gather. May
increase the need for social services. Possibly perceive their
environment to be more peaceful, cause fewer conflicts in the
area. |
A common place for the young
to gather may help to prevent social problems. May cause a feeling
of unease in local inhabitants and indirectly slightly increase the
need for social services. |
A common place for the young
to gather may help to prevent social problems. May cause some
feeling of unease in local inhabitants. No major impact on social
services. |
| Health sector
work/services |
Accidents |
No impact |
No impact on the absolute
number of accidents, but the geographical focus will be closer to
the cabin. |
No impact on the absolute
number of accidents, but the geographical focus will be closer to
the cabin. |
| Police |
Disturbances |
The situation remains
unchanged. The young will look for a new place to gather, and
disturbances may occur there. |
The cabin will be used by
the young. Others will avoid the jogging track and the
Piiparinpolku pathway. |
The cabin will not be used
by the young. The situation will remain unchanged / the cabin is
used by the young, fewer disturbances |
| Real estate
department |
Repairs and related costs.
construction |
Cost savings, but there may
be more mischief elsewhere, as the young have no place to meet each
other. |
The cabin can be built after
finding an alternative that will satisfy both the inhabitants and
the young. The place also has to fulfil technical
requirements. |
Approval by the
Environmental and Land-Use Planning Committee, if the cabin's
situation differs essentially from the previous one. |
| Maintenance
company |
Maintenance of the near
environment |
No impact |
Possible reports by local
inhabitants of disturbances |
Possible reports by local
inhabitants of disturbances |